"Activating FCTC Article 1(d)'s harm-reduction provisions — long dormant — is now the most consequential policy action available to global tobacco control"
I read the interview and the full report with great interest. I fully support the conclusions of the paper, but I believe insufficient analysis of cessation diminishes the credibility of the arguments. My experience is limited to the US experience and is summarized in several Substack articles.
The core arguments of the report would only be enhanced by explaining why tobacco treatment does not appear to be as effective as other medical treatments.
I read the interview and the full report with great interest. I fully support the conclusions of the paper, but I believe insufficient analysis of cessation diminishes the credibility of the arguments. My experience is limited to the US experience and is summarized in several Substack articles.
https://edwardanselm.substack.com/p/the-missing-link-in-tobacco-treatment?r=fp3rx
https://edwardanselm.substack.com/p/better-treatment-for-people-who-use?r=fp3rx
role of alternative nicotine products in tobacco harm reduction.
https://edwardanselm.substack.com/p/learned-helplessness-in-tobacco-treatment?r=fp3rx
The core arguments of the report would only be enhanced by explaining why tobacco treatment does not appear to be as effective as other medical treatments.
A real privilege to share my views and insights about ending smoking with you. Look forward to comments and feedback.
Thanks again, I really appreciate your answers.
Thanks and agree that more on cessation would be helpful- but great you filled that gap!